| 47 | 0 | 10 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
[目的]了解沙生植物在干旱条件下的适应性,为其大面积人工栽培、育种提供理论依据,同时为榆林沙区相关造林及管理工作提供科学支撑。[方法]选取陕西省神木市石圪台地区7种常见固沙植物,测定其相对电导率、叶绿素(a、b及总量)、抗氧化系统、膜脂过氧化物和渗透调节物质等相关生理指标,采用主成分分析法对7种植物的适应性进行综合评价。[结果]7种固沙植物在相对电导率、叶绿素a、叶绿素b、叶绿素总量、抗氧化系统、膜脂过氧化物和渗透调节物质等生理指标上均存在显著差异;叶绿素a和叶绿素b含量对主成分因子的贡献率较大,是影响榆林沙区植物生长的重要生理指标;7种植物适应性表现为紫穗槐>文冠果>柠条>蒙古莸>沙棘>沙柳>沙地柏。[结论]紫穗槐对榆林沙区环境的适应能力较强,是该区域造林种植的理想选择。
Abstract:[Objective]To investigate the adaptability of psammophyte under drought conditions, providing theoretical basis for their large-scale artificial cultivation and breeding, and offering scientific support for related afforestation and management work in the sandy areas of Yulin.[Method]Seven common sand-fixing plants in Shigetai area, Shenmu City, Shaanxi Province were selected.Their relative electrical conductivity, chlorophyll(a, b and total),antioxidant system, lipid hydroperoxide and osmotic adjustment substances were measured.The adaptability of the seven plants was comprehensively evaluated by principal component analysis.[Result] There were significant differences among the seven sand-fixing plants in terms of relative electrical conductivity, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, antioxidant system, lipid hydroperoxide and osmotic adjustment substances.The contents of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b had a greater contribution rate to the principal component factors and were important physiological indicators affecting the growth of plants in the sandy areas of Yulin. The adaptability ranking of the seven plants was Amorpha fruticosa>Xanthoceras sorbifolium>Caragana korshinskii>Elsholtzia splendens>Hippophae rhamnoides>Salix psammophila>Sabina vulgaris.[Conclusion]Amorpha fruticosa has a strong adaptability to the environment in the sandy areas of Yulin and is an ideal choice for afforestation in this region.
[1] 赵晓彬,曹双成,高静,等.毛乌素沙地植物多样性保护防沙治沙示范[J].中国野生植物资源,2021,40(6):64-72,84.
[2] 苏加鹏,白艳,张淑贞,等.榆林市毛乌素沙地植物资源变化分析[J].林业调查规划,2024,49(6):28-33.
[3] 任锐.榆林地区植被时空动态变化及驱动力分析[D].西安:西北大学,2022.
[4] 马锋,卓静,何慧娟,等.陕西省榆林市植被生态演变及其驱动机制[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(5):257-261,267,封3.
[5] 周齐,侯钰荣,于香杰,等.10份紫花苜蓿种质苗期抗旱性评价[J].种子,2025,44(9):154-163,171.
[6] 李翠,杨志臣,国宸嘉,等.22份花花柴种质资源耐盐性评价与鉴定[J].草地学报,2025,33(10):3353-3361.
[7] 王利群,南丽丽,马香香,等.30份苜蓿种质苗期耐盐性综合评价[J].中国草地学报,2025,47(7):70-82.
[8] 寇志伟.毛乌素榆林沙区灌木防护林健康评价[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021.
[9] 王涛,杨梅焕.榆林地区植被指数动态变化及其对气候和人类活动的响应[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(5):1133-1140.
[10] 王宁,万畅,高山,等.80份紫花苜蓿引进品种萌发期耐盐性评价[J].干旱地区农业研究,2024,42(2):17-25,52.
[11] 李合生,孙群,赵世杰,等.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[12] 徐新娟,李勇超.2种植物相对电导率测定方法比较[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(7):311-312.
[13] 隋可,刘泽宇,张玉霞,等.低温胁迫对'WL'系列苜蓿品种碳氮物质含量和相对电导率的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2025,27(10):63-71.
[14] 杨英楠,徐婷婷,马杰,等.以相对电导率研究菊花舌状花抗寒性遗传变异及其分子标记[J].植物生理学报,2020,56(2):275-284.
[15] 乔一娜,李云鸽,刘聘,等.10种观赏竹的光合特性及叶绿素荧光特性研究[J].热带作物学报,2020,41(7):1373-1379.
[16] 程睿,乔一娜,蔡星,等.水肥耦合处理对毛竹叶片生理特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2025,41(7):1312-1319.
[17] 李鑫鑫,杨晓娟,李丽莉,等.5个石榴品种的抗寒性评价[J].中国果树,2025(9):30-35.
[18] 农玉琴,巫虹颖,翁小婷,等.干旱胁迫对不同品种茶树幼苗生理特性的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2024,52(16):96-100.
[19] 郑东方,周帅,孟雪,等.低温胁迫下外源褪黑素对红花幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2025,53(8):168-172.
[20]周健,魏海霞,舒秀阁,等.基于光合参数和渗透调节物质的豆梨种质耐盐性评价分析[J/OL].分子植物育种,1-10[2025-10-31].Https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20250117.20924.002.
[21] 黄旭光,黄玲璞,王卫南,等.干旱胁迫及复水对朱槿幼苗生理特性的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2020,48(21):137-139,150.
[22] 彭春华,王羊,兰雨,等.淹水胁迫对酸枣幼苗生理特性的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2024,52(9):25-29.
[23] ZHANG C W,LIU X J.Effects of salt stress on growth and physiological characteristics of Chamerion angustifolium seedlings[J].Front Plant Sci,2025,16:1727650.
基本信息:
中图分类号:Q945
引用信息:
[1]秦于倩,乔一娜,刘永翔,等.榆林沙区7种植物生理特性及其适应性评价[J].安徽农业科学,2026,54(08):90-94.
基金信息:
陕西林业科技创新重点专项(SXLK2024-0206); 榆林市委、市政府专项“榆林防止二次沙化与水土流失调查研究”(榆政财资发[2021]47号); 国家定位观测研究站运行项目(SXLY-02)
2026-04-28
2026-04-28