nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, v.54 1-12+20
陆地棉和海岛棉种间TCP转录因子比较分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目(32201873); 广东石油化工学院人才引进项目(2019rc112); 广东省乡村振兴科技专项(2021S0074)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

[目的]比较陆地棉和海岛棉种间TCP基因家族成员特征。[方法]利用生物信息学方法对陆地棉和海岛棉TCP基因家族进行全基因组鉴定,并对其理化性质、染色体定位、系统进化和组织表达等方面进行比较分析。[结果]在陆地棉和海岛棉中分别鉴定到69和70个TCP基因,分别具有31对和34对同源基因分布在22和21条染色体上,均为亲水性蛋白。陆地棉和海岛棉之间鉴定到59对同源基因。系统进化关系显示其分为CIN、CYC/TB1和PCF共3个亚族。陆地棉和海岛棉中同亚族的TCP基因家族成员具有相似的基因结构。基因组织表达特异性分析发现,基因Ghir_D13G006190在陆地棉各组织都有表达,其同源基因Gbar_D13G006010在海岛棉各组织都没有表达,属于PCF亚类。Ghir_A09G000900仅在陆地棉花瓣中较高表达,其同源基因Gbar_A09G000980在海岛棉花瓣、花药、花柱中表达量较高,属于CIN亚类。Ghir_A12G023760在陆地棉叶中表达量最高,其同源基因Gbar_A12G023880在海岛棉茎中表达量最高,属于PCF亚类。顺式作用元件分析表明,陆地棉和海岛棉TCP基因家族启动子包含许多与植物光响应、生理响应、激素响应、胁迫响应相关的调控元件。[结论]该研究为进一步探究陆地棉和海岛棉TCP转录因子的功能差异提供重要的理论依据。

Abstract:

[Objective]To compare the characteristics of TCP gene family members between G. hirsutum and G. barbadense.[Method]Bioinformatics methods were used to identify the TCP gene family of G. hirsutum and G. barbadense in the whole genome, and to compare and analyze their physicochemical properties, chromosome localization, systematic evolution and tissue expression.[Result] 69 and 70 TCP genes were identified in G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, respectively, with 31 and 34 pairs of homologous genes distributed on 22 and 21 chromosomes, respectively, all of which were hydrophilic proteins. 59 pairs of homologous genes were identified between G. hirsutum and G. barbadense. The systematic evolutionary relationship showed that it was divided into three subfamilies: CIN, CYC/TB1 and PCF. TCP gene family members of the same subfamily in G. hirsutum and G. barbadense had similar gene structures.Gene tissue-specific expression analysis revealed that the gene Ghir_D13G006190 was expressed in all tissues of G. hirsutum, while the homologous gene Gbar_D13G006010 was not expressed in any tissue of G. barbadense, and belonged to the PCF class in the evolutionary tree. Ghir_A09G000900 was only highly expressed in petals of G. hirsutum, while the homologous gene Gbar_A09G000980 had the highest expression levels in petals, anthers and styles of G. barbadense, and belongs to the CIN class in the evolutionary tree.Ghir_A12G023760 was most highly expressed in leaves of G. hirsutum, while the homologous gene Gbar_A12G023880 was most highly expressed in stems of G. barbadense, and both belong to the PCF class in the evolutionary tree. Cis-acting element analysis showed that the promoters of the TCP gene family of G. hirsutum and G. barbadense contain many regulatory elements related to plant light response, physiological response, hormone response, and stress response. [Conclusion]This study provides an important theoretical basis for further exploring the functional differences of TCP transcription factors between G. hirsutum and G. barbadense.

参考文献

[1] SAUD S,WANG L C.Mechanism of cotton resistance to abiotic stress,and recent research advances in the osmoregulation related genes[J].Front Plant Sci,2022,13:1-17.

[2] MARTíN-TRILLO M,CUBAS P.TCP genes:A family snapshot ten years later[J].Trends Plant Sci,2010,15(1):31-39.

[3] CUBAS P,LAUTER N,DOEBLEY J,et al.The TCP domain:A motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development[J].Plant J,1999,18(2):215-222.

[4] ZHOU H Y,HWARARI D,MA H Y,et al.Genomic survey of TCP transcription factors in plants:Phylogenomics,evolution and their biology[J].Front Genet,2022,13:1-14.

[5] AGUILAR-MARTíNEZ J A,SINHA N.Analysis of the role of Arabidopsis class I TCP genes AtTCP7,AtTCP8,AtTCP22,and AtTCP23 in leaf development[J].Front Plant Sci,2013,4:1-13.

[6] 张靖男,韦丽君,陈娟娟,等.花生TCP家族基因鉴定及其在侧枝发育中的表达分析[J].河北农业大学学报,2022,45(3):25-33.

[7] YU L,CHEN Q W,ZHENG J R,et al.Genome-wide identification and expression pattern analysis of the TCP transcription factor family in Ginkgo biloba[J].Plant Signal Behav,2022,17(1):1-13.

[8] JIN K M,WANG Y J,ZHUO R Y,et al.TCP transcription factors involved in shoot development of ma bamboo(Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro)[J].Front Plant Sci,2022,13:1-20.

[9] CHEN C J,CHEN H,ZHANG Y,et al.TBtools:An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data[J].Mol Plant,2020,13(8):1194-1202.

[10] WANG M J,TU L L,YUAN D J,et al.Reference genome sequences of two cultivated allotetraploid cottons,Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense[J].Nat Genet,2019,51(2):224-229.

[11] 蒋梦琦,薛晓东,苏立遥,等.龙眼TCP家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J].园艺学报,2021,48(12):2481-2496.

[12] KIEFFER M,MASTER V,WAITES R,et al.TCP14 and TCP15 affect internode length and leaf shape in Arabidopsis[J].Plant J,2011,68(1):147-158.

[13] TATEMATSU K,NAKABAYASHI K,KAMIYA Y,et al.Transcription factor AtTCP14 regulates embryonic growth potential during seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana[J].Plant J,2008,53(1):42-52.

[14] KOYAMA T,FURUTANI M,TASAKA M,et al.TCP transcription factors control the morphology of shoot lateral organs via negative regulation of the expression of boundary-specific genes in Arabidopsis[J].Plant Cell,2007,19(2):473-484.

[15] 刘洋,张慧,辛大伟,等.大豆TCP转录因子家族结构域分析及功能预测[J].大豆科学,2012,31(5):707-713,717.

[16] 周汪洋,吴飞燕,赵苗羽,等.番木瓜TCP转录因子鉴定及在果实成熟中的表达[J].浙江农业科学,2024,65(11):2693-2702.

[17] 郝琴.毛竹PheTCP19基因的生物学功能研究[D].杭州:浙江农林大学,2024.

[18]宋宇英,江敏,王世杰,等.蒙古栎TCP基因家族全基因组鉴定与分析[J/OL].分子植物育种,2023-08-15[2023-08-17].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.s.26230814.1022.002.

[19]谭政委,郭水柱,苏小雨,等.全基因组水平金银花TCP基因家族的鉴定及表达模式分析[J].中草药,2024,55(5):1665-1676.

[20]周棋赢,韩月华,祝悦,等.茶树TCP家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达分析[J].园艺学报,2019,46(10):2021-2036.

[21]李海伦.甜瓜TCP转录因子基因家族鉴定与表达分析[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2022:37-40.

[22]陈国梁,祖欢欢,薛宝平,等.枣TCP转录因子鉴定与生物信息学分析[J].分子植物育种,2019,17(9):2821-2827.

[23]MANIATIS T,TASIC B.Alternative pre-mRNA splicing and proteome expansion in metazoans[J].Nature,2002,418(6894):236-243.

[24]袁伟,顾掌根,褚伟雄,等.黄瓜转录因子TCP基因家族的鉴定及结构分析[J].分子植物育种,2014,12(2):287-295.

[25]刘俊,李龙,吴耀松,等.杜仲TCP转录因子鉴定及生物信息学分析[J].中草药,2022,53(18):5813-5824.

[26]杨婷,黎成,申佳瑜,等.茄子TCP基因家族全基因组的鉴定与分析[J].生物工程学报,2022,38(8):2974-2988.

基本信息:

中图分类号:S562

引用信息:

[1]塞米热·斯来依曼,彭幼珊,刘家璇,等.陆地棉和海岛棉种间TCP转录因子比较分析[J].安徽农业科学,2026,54(02):1-12+20.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金项目(32201873); 广东石油化工学院人才引进项目(2019rc112); 广东省乡村振兴科技专项(2021S0074)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文