nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 24, v.53 102-106+126
酸性改良剂对映山红生境土壤性状及植株生长的影响
基金项目(Foundation): 广州市科技计划项目(202206010058); 广州林业园林科学技术研究专项(2061900000139); 城维计划-景区日常绿化养护经费项目(TXCG2022016); 广州市林业和园林局部门预算项目(202307130200)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

[目的]提升城市绿地映山红的生长势和开花质量。[方法]以白云山鸣春谷景区种植的映山红为研究对象,对比分析了改良区域(T处理)与非改良区域(CK)映山红生长指标、土壤理化性质及二者间的相关性。[结果]T处理映山红的株高、冠幅、叶面积等生长指标较CK分别提高了7.5%、10.4%和15.8%,整体的生长势提升22.7%;T处理着花量和开花率显著优于CK,分别提升20.9%和21.7%,观赏价值大幅提高;T处理映山红根鲜重和根活力较CK分别增加31.5%和24.6%,土壤改良促进了映山红根系生长;土壤理化性质的测定结果进一步印证了土壤改良的显著效果。T处理土壤pH降低1.88,与CK差异显著;土壤EC值、有机质含量和通气度分别提高1 200.0%、313.2%和159.6%,容重下降21.9%;映山红的生理生长、开花质量与土壤pH、有机质含量和通气度存在显著相关性。[结论]施加酸性改良剂对映山红立地土壤改良效果显著,不仅促进了映山红地上与地下部分的生长,还改善了开花效果,有效地提升了映山红生态功能和观赏价值。

Abstract:

[Objective]To improve the growth potential and flowering quality of Rhododendron simsii in urban green spaces.[Method]This study took Rhododendron simsii planted in Mingchun Valley Scenic Area of Baiyun Mountain as the research object, and comparatively analyzed the growth indexes, soil physical and chemical properties, and their correlations between the improved area(T) and the non-improved area(CK).[Result]The results showed that: The growth indexes such as plant height, crown width, and leaf area of Rhododendron simsii in treatment T increased by 7.5%,10.4%,and 15.8% respectively compared with CK,and the overall growth potential increased by 22.7%;the flowering amount and flowering rate of T were significantly better than those of CK,increasing by 20.9% and 21.7% respectively, which greatly improved the ornamental value; the root fresh weight and root activity of Rhododendron simsii in T increased by 31.5% and 24.6% respectively compared with CK,indicating that soil improvement promoted the root growth of Rhododendron simsii;the determination results of soil physical and chemical properties further confirmed the significant effect of soil improvement.The soil pH value in T decreased by 1.88,showing a significant difference from CK;at the same time, the soil EC value, organic matter content, and aeration increased by 1 200.0%,313.2%,and 159.6% respectively, and the bulk density decreased by 21.9%;there was a significant correlation between the physiological growth, flowering quality of Rhododendron simsii and soil pH value, organic matter content, and aeration.[Conclusion]The application of acid amendments has a significant effect on improving the soil in the Rhododendron simsii habitat, which not only promotes the growth of aboveground and underground parts of Rhododendron simsii,but also improves the flowering effect, effectively enhancing the ecological function and ornamental value of Rhododendron simsii.

参考文献

[1] 张银凤.深圳城市公园不同栽植环境对毛棉杜鹃生长生理特性的影响研究[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2022.

[2] 邓世娟.上海杜鹃花栽培环境及土壤条件调查与分析[J].中国园艺文摘,2015,31(4):77-80.

[3] 郑硕理,张巧玲,张陈阼,等.耐热杜鹃花种质及其在暖热地区栽培研究进展[J].湖南生态科学学报,2019,6(1):49-55.

[4] 张银凤,蔡洪月,彭金根,等.深圳城市公园不同栽植环境对毛棉杜鹃生长的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,47(2):197-204.

[5] 何立.安酷杜鹃‘康乃馨’在武汉市的引种栽培与应用[J].现代园艺,2022(9):66-68.

[6] 崔秋芳,张晗钰.河南杜鹃生境土壤特性[J].林业科技通讯,2022(6):37-40.

[7] 何卓彦,庄雪影.杜鹃花属植物在广州园林绿地中的应用[J].广东园林,2009,31(1):64-68.

[8] 周惠民,李畅,何丽斯,等.生物质炭对杜鹃花生长及城市绿地土壤环境的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2023,51(5):172-178.

[9] 潘根兴,卞荣军,程琨.从废弃物处理到生物质制造业:基于热裂解的生物质科技与工程[J].科技导报,2017,35(23):82-93.

[10] ZHOU H M,LI X Y,LI C,et al.Biochar pyrolyzed at low temperature enhanced acidophilous plant growth by promoting rhizospheric microbes in a slightly alkaline urban soil[J].Biochar,2021,3(4):603-614.

[11] 卜晓莉,姬慧娟,马文宝,等.2种生物炭浸提液对4种杜鹃属植物种子萌发的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报,2021,30(1):72-74.

[12] BU X L,MA W,JI H J,et al.Seed germination and early seelding growth of Rhododendron species in biochar-amended peat substrates[J].Communications in Soil Sceince and Plant Analusis,2020,51(17):2310-2321.

[13] 李晓英.生物质炭基液态肥对杜鹃花土壤质量及植物生长的影响[D].扬州:扬州大学,2021.

[14] 张中玮.生长调节剂对映山红花期与光合特性的影响[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2019.

[15] 徐忠,张春英.上海杜鹃花栽培及应用[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014.

[16] 张杰,黄军华,顾海燕,等.盆栽基质pH调节及其对杜鹃花生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2017(21):94-100.

[17] 张杰,黄军华,顾海燕,等.不同基质对盆栽杜鹃花生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(34):116-119.

[18] 魏依娜,刘亚,吴永彬,等.毛棉杜鹃和刺毛杜鹃在广州的生长特性研究[J].广东园林,2014,36(2):48-50.

[19] 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所森林土壤研究室.森林土壤pH值的测定:LY/T 1239—1999[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.

[20] 北京农业大学土壤及植物营养系.森林土壤水溶性盐分分析:LY/T 1251—1999[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.

[21] 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所森林土壤研究室.森林土壤有机质的测定及碳氮比的计算:LY/T 1237—1999[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.

[22] 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所森林土壤研究室.森林土壤水分-物理性质的测定:LY/T 1215—1999[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.

[23] 吴婷,高健洲,赵志琴,等.芍药设施栽培品种筛选[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(3):8-11.

[24] 熊燕,曲彦婷,唐焕伟,等.低温胁迫及不同基质对高山杜鹃生理和根系活力的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2013,44(10):117-121,2.

[25] 李婧男,孙向阳,李素艳.有机无机改良剂对滨海盐渍化土壤酶活性和土壤微生物量的影响[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(5):160-165.

[26] 李菊,杨永志,甘良,等.土壤改良剂和有机肥对旱改水砖红壤稻田的改良效果[J].中国土壤与肥料,2022(4):91-98.

[27] 代保清,薛晟岩.有机土壤改良剂对树木生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J].防护林科技,2022(4):52-54,60.

[28] 劳若霞,曾玉云,张美凤,等.不同肥料对杜鹃观赏性状影响的探讨[J].江西农业大学学报,1985,7(4):75-79.

基本信息:

中图分类号:S156.6;S685.21

引用信息:

[1]郭泽平,李铤,文理,等.酸性改良剂对映山红生境土壤性状及植株生长的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2025,53(24):102-106+126.

基金信息:

广州市科技计划项目(202206010058); 广州林业园林科学技术研究专项(2061900000139); 城维计划-景区日常绿化养护经费项目(TXCG2022016); 广州市林业和园林局部门预算项目(202307130200)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文