安徽农业科学

树立文化自信与振兴乡村文化呈现“体用关系”,其中，树立文化自信是“体”,为乡村文化振兴注入内生动力；乡村文化振兴是“用”,为文化自信提供历史根基与现实支撑。在价值意蕴方面，乡村文化振兴通过文化基因的当代重构，实现历史传统与现代制度的双向赋能与融合；通过文化与治理的整合，将文化资源转化为治理效能，构建乡村新型治理秩序；通过本土文化与国际视野的对话，动态激活本土文化基因以丰富全球乡村治理样本；乡村文化振兴亦是基层治理现代化的本质要求，为“三治合一”提供精神支撑。在法治路径方面，乡村文化振兴需坚持立法先行，构建乡村文化振兴法律体系，完善专项立法与地方特色规定；规范执法以健全文化治理执行机制，并平衡法律刚性与文化弹性的辩证统一；公正司法以完善文化权益保障体系，精准供给司法资源并强化文化权益保护；构建“法-政策-村规民约”三级规范体系，实现多元规范协同治理。

Establishing cultural self-confidence and rural cultural revitalization constitute a “Substance-Function relationship”: cultural confidence is “Substance”, which injects endogenous power into rural cultural revitalization; rural cultural revitalization is “Function”, which provides historical foundation and realistic support for cultural confidence.In terms of value implication, the revitalization of rural culture realizes the two-way empowerment and integration of historical tradition and modern system through the contemporary reconstruction of cultural genes; through the integration of culture and governance, cultural resources will be transformed into governance efficiency, and a new rural governance order will be constructed; through the dialogue between the local culture and the international perspective, we can dynamically activate the local culture genes to enrich the global rural governance samples; the revitalization of rural culture is also the essential requirement of the modernization of grass-roots governance, which provides spiritual support for the “Three Governances in Oneness”.In terms of the path of rule of law, rural cultural revitalization needs to adhere to the principle of legislation first, build a legal system for rural cultural revitalization, and improve special legislation and local characteristics; regulate law enforcement to improve the implementation mechanism of cultural governance, and balance the dialectical unity of legal rigidity and cultural flexibility; fair justice to improve the protection system of cultural rights and interests, accurately supply judicial resources and strengthen the protection of cultural rights and interests; establish a three-level regulatory system of “law, policy and village rules and regulations” to realize coordinated governance of multiple norms.