刘京国;郭蓓;赵晓萌;师光禄;

• 1:北京农学院生物技术学院/农业部都市农业(北方)重点实验室

摘要(Abstract)：

[目的]对缺失α1螺旋的Cry1Ac在大肠杆菌中的表达、纯化和活性进行分析。[方法]以苏云金芽孢杆菌HD-1中的质粒为模板,扩增缺乏α螺旋的Cry1Ac基因,并将其与pET28a载体连接,构建重组质粒。重组质粒转化并经IPTG诱导后,用SDS-PAGE检测目的蛋白的表达。提取目标蛋白,并涂在棉铃虫饲料表面,检测其杀虫活性。[结果]Cry1Acdelα1基因在大肠杆菌中能正常表达目标蛋白,但该目标蛋白是以包涵体形式存在。生侧结果显示,在相同浓度下,活化的Cry1Ac对棉铃虫的致死率达75%以上,而Cry1Acdelα1只有10%左右。[结论]用大肠杆菌表达的Cry1Acdelα1对棉铃虫基本没有杀虫活性。

关键词(KeyWords)： Cry1Ac;α1片段;杀虫活性

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 北京市自然科学基金(5092007和5112009)

作者(Author): 刘京国;郭蓓;赵晓萌;师光禄;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]SCHNEPF E,CRICKMORE N,Van RIE J,et al.Bacillus thuringiensis andits pesticidal crystal proteins[J].Microbiology and Molecular Biology Re-views,1998,62(3):775-806.
• [2]HFTE H,WHITELEY H R.Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacilllusthuringiensis[J].Microbiological Reviews,1989,53(2):242-255.
• [3]DERBYSHIRE D J,ELLAR D J,LI J.Crystallization of the Bacillusthuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac and its complex with the receptor ligand N-ace-tyl-D-galactosamine[J].Acta Crystallographica Section D,2001,57:1938-1944.
• [4]LI J,DERBYSHIRE D J,PROMDONKOY B,et al.Structural implicationsfor the transformation of the Bacillus thuringiensisδ-endotoxins from water-soluble to membrane-inserted forms[J].Biochemical Society Transactions,2001,29:571-577.
• [5]GMEZ I,SANCHEZ J,MIRANDA R,et al.Cadherin-like receptor bind-ing facilitates proteolytic cleavage of helix a-1 in domain I and oligomerpre-pore formation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin[J].FEBS Letter,2002,513:242-246.
• [6]BRAVO A,GMEZ I,CONDE J,et al.Oligomerization triggers binding of aBacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab pore-forming toxin to aminopeptidase N re-ceptor leading to insertion into membrane microdomains[J].Biochimica etBiophysica Acta,2004,1667:38-46.
• [7]SOBERON M,PARDO-LPEZ L,LPEZ I,et al.Engineering modified Bttoxins to counter insect resistance[J].Science,2007,318(5856):1640-1642.
• [8]ZHUANG M,OLTEAN D I,GMEZ I,et al.Heliothis virescens and Mandu-ca sexta lipid rafts are involved in Cry1A toxin binding to the midgut epi-thelium and subsequent pore formation[J].The Journal of BiologicalChemistry,2002,277:13863-13872.
• [9]JANMAAT A F,MYERS J.Rapid evolution and the cost of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis in greenhouse populations of cabbage loopers,Trichoplusia ni[J].Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,Series B,Biological Sciences,2003,270(1530):2263-2270.
• [10]TABASHNIK B E.Implications of gene amplification for evolution andmanagement of insecticide resistance[J].Journal of Economic Entomolo-gy,1990,83(4):1170-1176.
• [11]LUO S D,WANG G R,LIANG G M,et al.Binding of three Cry1A toxinsin resistant and susceptible strains of cotton bollworm(Helicoverpa armig-era)[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2006,85(2):104-109.
• [12]ZHANG S P,CHENG H M,GAO Y L,et al.Mutation of an aminopeptid-ase N gene is associated with Helicoverpa armigera resistance to Bacillusthuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin[J].Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biolo-gy,2009,39(7):421-429.
• [13]JURAT-FUENTES J L,KARUMBAIAH L,JAKKA S R K,et al.Reducedlevels of membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase are common to lepidop-teran strains resistant to Cry toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis[J].PLoSOne,2011,6(3):17606.
• [14]XU X,YU L,WU Y.Disruption of a cadherin gene associated with resist-ance to Cry1Acδ-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in Helicoverpa ar-migera[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2005,71:948-954.